Extract DataExamples by Discipline

Extract Data examples by discipline

Ready-to-copy field sets for twelve research disciplines — from clinical medicine and public health to computer science, engineering, and economics.

Copy a set, then edit the wording to match your corpus. Type is the output structure: Answer, Yes/Maybe/No, or Specified with the choice list shown. For the full overview of what you can do with Extract Data — twelve field families, fifteen use cases, and four starter packs — see What you can do with Extract Data. For how to word a field, see Tips for creating better extraction fields.

1. Clinical medicine — intervention trials

Example topic: Effect of early mobilisation on ICU length of stay.

FieldTypeInstructions
Study designSpecified — RCT, Cluster RCT, Non-randomised trial, Prospective cohort, Retrospective cohort, Case-control, Before-afterClassify the design as the authors label it. Pick the single best fit.
Analysed sampleAnswerNumber of participants in the primary analysis, not screened or randomised. Total first, per-arm in parentheses if reported. Format: "294 (148/146)".
PopulationAnswerWho was studied: condition, mean or median age with its spread, and % female, exactly as printed. Format: "Mechanically ventilated ICU adults; mean age 62.4 (SD 14.1); 41% female".
InterventionAnswerWhat the intervention group received: what was done, how often, for how long, and by whom. Format: "Progressive mobilisation, twice daily, from ICU day 1, physiotherapist-delivered".
ComparatorAnswerWhat the control group received, in the authors' words. If usual care, say what usual care included if described.
Primary outcomeAnswerThe outcome the authors designate as primary, and how it was measured. Do not list secondary outcomes here.
Primary resultAnswerThe effect on the primary outcome with its 95% CI and p-value exactly as printed, naming the metric. Format: "MD −1.9 days (95% CI −3.1 to −0.7), p=0.002".
Follow-upAnswerLongest timepoint at which outcomes were measured, in the paper's unit. Format: "90 days".
Adverse eventsAnswerSerious adverse events with denominators, per arm, exactly as printed. Do not convert counts to percentages. If none reported, answer "Not reported".
Author limitationsAnswerLimitations the authors state themselves, one short bullet each. Do not add your own.

2. Public health & epidemiology

Example topic: Air pollution exposure and childhood asthma incidence.

FieldTypeInstructions
Study designSpecified — Prospective cohort, Retrospective cohort, Case-control, Cross-sectional, Ecological, Time-seriesClassify the design as the authors describe it.
Exposure measureAnswerThe pollutant and how exposure was assigned: monitoring station, land-use regression, satellite, personal monitor. Include averaging period. Format: "PM2.5, land-use regression, annual mean".
Outcome definitionAnswerHow the health outcome was defined and ascertained: diagnosis code, registry, parent report, spirometry.
Population and settingAnswerAge range, country or city, and cohort name if any. Format: "Children 0–12 y; Barcelona, Spain; INMA cohort".
Sample sizeAnswerNumber of individuals in the analysis, and person-years if reported. Format: "3,412 children; 28,700 person-years".
Confounders adjustedAnswerVariables in the fully adjusted model, listed as printed. Format: comma-separated list.
Effect estimateAnswerEffect for the main exposure–outcome pair, with metric, per-unit increment, and 95% CI exactly as printed. Format: "HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.04–1.22) per 5 µg/m³ PM2.5".
Study periodAnswerCalendar years of data collection. Format: "2008–2016".

3. Pharmacology & drug safety

Example topic: Adverse events reported for GLP-1 receptor agonists.

FieldTypeInstructions
Drug and doseAnswerDrug studied with dose and schedule exactly as reported. Format: "Semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly, subcutaneous".
IndicationAnswerThe condition treated as stated by the authors.
Data sourceSpecified — RCT, Observational cohort, Spontaneous reports / pharmacovigilance, Claims database, Registry, Case reportClassify where the safety data came from.
Exposure periodAnswerTreatment duration and total exposure if reported. Format: "68 weeks; 1,961 patient-years".
Adverse events reportedAnswerAll adverse events the paper reports with incidence, one bullet each, with denominators as printed.
Serious adverse eventsAnswerSerious adverse events with denominators per arm, exactly as printed. If none, answer "Not reported".
DiscontinuationsAnswerNumber discontinuing due to adverse events, with denominator, per arm. Format: "70/1306 (5.4%) vs 15/652 (2.3%)".
Signal notedYes/Maybe/NoDo the authors identify a new or unexpected safety signal? yes only if they explicitly say so. no if no new or unexpected signal is described anywhere. maybe if a potential signal is discussed only tentatively.
Funding sourceSpecified — Industry, Public/government, Charity/foundation, Mixed, None statedClassify the funding as stated in the funding or COI section.

4. HEOR & health economics

Example topic: Cost-effectiveness of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.

FieldTypeInstructions
Model typeSpecified — Markov, Decision tree, Discrete event simulation, Partitioned survival, Trial-based analysis, Other modelClassify the economic model structure as described.
PerspectiveSpecified — Healthcare payer, Societal, Provider, Patient, MultipleClassify the stated analytic perspective.
ComparatorsAnswerInterventions compared, one short bullet each, in the authors' wording.
Time horizonAnswerThe base-case time horizon exactly as stated. Format: "Lifetime (50 years)".
Discount rateAnswerDiscount rates for costs and outcomes as stated. Format: "3.5% costs, 3.5% outcomes".
Cost year and currencyAnswerPrice year and currency of reported costs. Do not convert. Format: "2022 GBP".
Utility sourceAnswerWhere utility values came from: instrument, population, and citation as described. Format: "EQ-5D-3L, UK tariff, from trial data".
ICERAnswerBase-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with currency, price year, and unit. Format: "£24,300 per QALY (2022 GBP)".
Sensitivity analysisAnswerWhich parameters drove the result in one-way or probabilistic sensitivity analysis, as the authors report.
ConclusionSpecified — Cost-effective at stated threshold, Not cost-effective, Dominant, Dominated, Mixed by subgroupClassify the authors' base-case conclusion.

5. Medical devices, diagnostics & regulatory evidence

Example topic: Clinical performance of point-of-care troponin assays.

FieldTypeInstructions
Device or assayAnswerName and manufacturer of the device or assay evaluated, exactly as printed.
Indication and useAnswerClinical question and setting in which the device was used. Format: "Rule-out of MI in ED chest pain presentations".
Reference standardAnswerThe comparator standard against which performance was judged, as described.
Sample sizeAnswerNumber of patients or specimens in the performance analysis, with the number of positives if reported. Format: "1,282 patients; 145 MI-positive".
SensitivityAnswerSensitivity with 95% CI exactly as printed, at the stated threshold. Format: "98.6% (95% CI 95.1–99.8) at 5 ng/L".
SpecificityAnswerSpecificity with 95% CI exactly as printed, at the same threshold.
Adverse events / safetyAnswerDevice-related adverse events or safety findings reported. If the study reports none, answer "Not reported".
Favourable outcomesAnswerFindings the authors present as supporting device performance, one bullet each.
Unfavourable outcomesAnswerFindings the authors present as limitations of device performance, one bullet each.
Funding / sponsorSpecified — Manufacturer-funded, Independent/public, Mixed, None statedClassify funding as stated.

6. Psychology & behavioural science

Example topic: Efficacy of CBT for adolescent anxiety.

FieldTypeInstructions
DesignSpecified — RCT, Quasi-experimental, Single-group pre-post, Cross-sectional, Longitudinal observationalClassify the design as the authors describe it.
Age rangeAnswerAge range and mean age of participants exactly as printed. Format: "12–17 y; mean 14.3 (SD 1.6)".
Outcome instrumentAnswerThe named scale used for the primary outcome, with version and scoring range if stated. Format: "SCARED, child version, 0–82".
Delivery formatSpecified — Individual in-person, Group in-person, Therapist-guided digital, Self-guided digital, BlendedClassify how the intervention was delivered.
DoseAnswerNumber of sessions and session length as reported. Format: "12 sessions × 50 min over 14 weeks".
Control conditionAnswerWhat the comparison group received: waitlist, treatment as usual, active control, placebo.
Effect sizeAnswerBetween-group effect size for the primary outcome with 95% CI, naming the metric. Format: "Hedges' g −0.61 (95% CI −0.92 to −0.30)".
AttritionAnswerNumber and percentage lost to follow-up, per arm if reported. Format: "18/94 (19%) vs 11/91 (12%)".
PreregisteredYes/Maybe/NoDoes the paper state that the study or analysis plan was preregistered? yes only if a registry or ID is given. no if no registration statement or ID appears anywhere. maybe if registration is mentioned without an identifier.

7. Computer science & machine learning

Example topic: Retrieval-augmented generation methods on open-domain QA.

FieldTypeInstructions
Method nameAnswerThe name the authors give their proposed method or model. Format: name only.
ArchitectureAnswerModel architecture and size, and the base model it builds on. Format: "Decoder-only, 7B, Llama-2 base".
Task and datasetAnswerTask addressed and the datasets evaluated on, as named by the authors. Format: comma-separated dataset names.
Training dataAnswerData used for training or fine-tuning, with size, exactly as reported. If the model is used zero-shot, answer "Not applicable".
Primary metricSpecified — Accuracy, F1, Exact match, BLEU/ROUGE, AUC, Human evaluation, OtherClassify the headline metric the authors emphasise.
Best resultAnswerHighest score the authors report for their method on the primary benchmark, with the metric and dataset. Copy decimals exactly. Format: "54.2 EM (NQ)".
Baselines comparedAnswerBaselines the method is compared against, one short bullet each, with their reported scores if given.
Ablations runAnswerAblation studies reported and what each removed, one bullet each. If none, answer "Not reported".
Compute reportedAnswerHardware and training or inference cost as reported. Format: "8× A100 80GB, 36 GPU-hours". If not stated, answer "Not reported".
Code availableYes/Maybe/NoDoes the paper state that code is publicly available? yes only if a repository link or explicit availability statement is given. no if no code-availability statement or link appears anywhere, including footnotes and appendix. maybe if code is available on request or promised for later release.

8. Engineering & materials science

Example topic: Mechanical properties of recycled PET composites.

FieldTypeInstructions
Material systemAnswerMatrix and reinforcement with weight or volume fractions exactly as printed. Format: "rPET + 20 wt% short glass fibre".
Processing methodAnswerHow specimens were produced, with key parameters. Format: "Twin-screw extrusion, 265 °C, then injection moulding".
Test standardAnswerThe standard followed for the primary test, exactly as cited. Format: "ASTM D638 Type I".
Specimens testedAnswerNumber of specimens per condition, as reported. Format: "n=5 per condition".
Tensile strengthAnswerTensile strength for the primary composition, with unit and standard deviation as printed. Do not convert units. Format: "48.2 ± 2.1 MPa".
ModulusAnswerYoung's modulus for the same composition, with unit and spread as printed.
Test conditionsAnswerTemperature, humidity, strain rate, and conditioning as reported.
Comparison to virgin materialYes/Maybe/NoDoes the paper compare the recycled material against a virgin-material control? yes if a virgin-material control is tested or reported alongside. no if no such comparison appears anywhere in the results. maybe if compared only against literature values.

9. Environmental science & ecology

Example topic: Effectiveness of marine protected areas on fish biomass.

FieldTypeInstructions
LocationAnswerStudy location with country and named site or region. Format: "Medes Islands, Spain (NW Mediterranean)".
Protection levelSpecified — No-take reserve, Partially protected, Multi-use, Unprotected control, MixedClassify the protection status studied.
Time since designationAnswerYears between protection designation and data collection, as reported. Format: "18 years".
Sampling methodAnswerHow the outcome was measured, with effort. Format: "Underwater visual census, 50 × 5 m transects, n=120".
Outcome measuredAnswerThe ecological outcome and its unit exactly as reported. Format: "Total fish biomass, g/m²".
Effect reportedAnswerDifference between protected and control, with metric and uncertainty exactly as printed. Format: "+3.1× biomass inside reserve (95% CI 2.2–4.4)".
Confounders addressedAnswerHabitat, depth, or fishing-pressure differences the authors control for, as described. If not addressed, answer "Not reported".

10. Education

Example topic: Impact of flipped classrooms on student outcomes.

FieldTypeInstructions
Education levelSpecified — Primary, Secondary, Undergraduate, Postgraduate, Professional/CPD, MixedClassify the level of the learners studied.
Subject areaAnswerThe subject or course in which the intervention was delivered, as named.
DesignSpecified — RCT, Quasi-experimental with control, Pre-post single group, Cross-sectional survey, QualitativeClassify the study design.
SampleAnswerNumber of students analysed, and number of classes or institutions if reported. Format: "412 students, 6 sections, 1 university".
Implementation lengthAnswerHow long the intervention ran, in the paper's unit. Format: "One 15-week semester".
Outcome measureAnswerHow learning was measured: exam score, standardised test, grade, self-report scale. Name the instrument.
Effect on outcomeAnswerDifference between conditions with effect size and CI or p-value exactly as printed.
Control conditionAnswerWhat the comparison group experienced, in the authors' words.
Fidelity reportedYes/Maybe/NoDoes the paper report whether the intervention was implemented as designed? yes if fidelity or adherence data is reported. no if implementation fidelity is not mentioned anywhere. maybe if fidelity is discussed without data.

11. Qualitative research & implementation science

Example topic: Barriers to telehealth uptake among older adults.

FieldTypeInstructions
MethodSpecified — Semi-structured interviews, Focus groups, Ethnography/observation, Document analysis, Mixed qualitativeClassify the primary data-collection method.
Theoretical frameworkAnswerThe named theory, model, or framework guiding the study. If none is named, answer "Not reported".
ParticipantsAnswerWho took part, how many, and how they were recruited. Format: "24 adults aged 68–91, purposive sampling from 3 primary care practices".
SettingAnswerWhere the study took place: country, service, and context.
Analysis approachAnswerThe analytic method as named, with any coding procedure described. Format: "Reflexive thematic analysis, two coders, NVivo".
Themes identifiedAnswerThe themes the authors report, one short bullet each, in the authors' own labels.
Barriers reportedAnswerBarriers the authors identify, one short bullet each. Include only barriers this study found.
Facilitators reportedAnswerFacilitators the authors identify, one short bullet each. If none, answer "Not reported".
Saturation reportedYes/Maybe/NoDo the authors state that data saturation was reached? yes only if explicitly stated. no if saturation is not mentioned anywhere. maybe if implied (e.g. "no new themes emerged") without the term.
Ethics approvalAnswerThe ethics committee and approval reference exactly as printed. If absent, answer "Not reported".

12. Economics, business & policy

Example topic: Minimum wage effects on employment.

FieldTypeInstructions
Jurisdiction and periodAnswerGeography and years covered by the analysis. Format: "United States, 1990–2019, state-level".
Data sourceAnswerThe dataset used, named exactly, with its unit of observation. Format: "QCEW, county-quarter".
Identification strategySpecified — Difference-in-differences, Synthetic control, Instrumental variables, Regression discontinuity, Event study, OLS/descriptiveClassify the main identification approach.
Treatment definitionAnswerHow the policy or treatment is defined and measured in the analysis.
Outcome variableAnswerThe dependent variable and its unit exactly as defined. Format: "Log teen employment rate".
Main estimateAnswerThe headline coefficient with its standard error or CI exactly as printed, naming the specification. Format: "−0.021 (SE 0.014), preferred DiD specification".
Robustness checksAnswerRobustness or placebo tests reported, one short bullet each.
Data/code availableYes/Maybe/NoDoes the paper state that replication data or code is available? yes if an availability statement or link is given. no if no such statement appears anywhere. maybe if available on request.

See also